Turn repetitive coordination into controlled workflows with clear owners and exceptions.
Automation should make follow-ups timely, exceptions visible and ownership clear while leaving relationship decisions with your team. We design practical workflows around the events that consume time or create leakage.

A focused set of modules and workflows configured around the way your practice operates.
SIP rejections, failed debits and upcoming SIP end dates are turned into assigned tasks against the right investor, with the reason attached. Unresolved items escalate on a schedule, so a bounced instalment gets a timely conversation instead of being noticed months later.
Each new client moves through a checklist covering KYC, PAN, bank proof, nominee details and first transaction. Missing items trigger reminders to the client and the owner, and the onboarding record shows exactly what is pending and since when.
Defined events, such as a request being logged, a meeting being booked or a document still pending, send a pre-approved WhatsApp or email message. Every message is logged on the client record, and sensitive conversations stay with a person.
When a review falls due, the system creates a preparation task with the family's last notes and open actions. After the meeting, agreed actions become tasks with owners and dates, and a summary can be sent to the client for their records.
Requests are routed by category to the right person or desk, with a target turnaround. If a request passes its target, it escalates to a team lead and then the principal, keeping overdue work visible without anyone having to chase manually.
Recurring routines, like the morning exception check, weekly pipeline review and monthly brokerage reconciliation, are created automatically for the right owner. The work no longer depends on someone remembering it, and skipped routines show up in reports.
The best first candidates are workflows that happen often, follow a clear rule, and cause real harm when missed. If a task needs judgment every time, it is a poor candidate. If it is a reminder, a handoff or a status check, it probably belongs in a workflow.
SIP rejection and failed debit information usually arrives through RTA mailback files and reports from CAMS and KFintech, or through BSE StAR MF, NSE NMF II and MF Utilities. When that data is imported on a regular schedule, each exception can create a task linked to the investor and folio, with the rejection reason recorded.
The owner contacts the client, records the outcome and closes the task. If nothing happens within the agreed window, the task escalates. A similar rule can flag SIPs nearing their end date so the relationship manager can discuss the client's plans in good time. The workflow prompts the conversation; any recommendation remains a matter for the qualified person handling the relationship.
Automated messages work well for acknowledgements, confirmations and reminders. They work poorly for anything involving investment decisions, performance or sensitive personal matters, which should always come from a person.
Before switching on a trigger, confirm that the client has opted in, the template is approved by your WhatsApp provider, and the wording has been reviewed internally. Set quiet hours and frequency limits so clients are not overwhelmed. Communication requirements should be confirmed against current AMFI and SEBI guidance.
Every automation should be written down in plain terms before it is built. A useful format is: when this happens, this person does this, by this time, unless this exception applies. If the rule cannot be stated clearly, it is not ready to automate.
Exceptions matter as much as the rule. A request waiting on an AMC or RTA should move to a separate status so internal ageing and third-party time are tracked apart. A client who is travelling can have a follow-up date set rather than triggering repeated reminders.
Measure completion within the target window, the age of open items and the number of exceptions that needed manual handling. Also watch for tasks that are closed without a real outcome, which usually signals a rule that creates noise rather than useful work.
Review each workflow monthly with the people who use it. Retire rules that nobody acts on, tighten the ones that fire too late, and add new ones only when the current set is running well. Aina CRM implementations treat this review as part of the rollout, because automation that is not maintained drifts away from how the practice works.
We start with how work happens today, then build and improve in controlled phases.
Step 1
Step 2
Step 3
Step 4
Rejection data can create structured follow-up tasks when the relevant files, exports or integrations are available.
No. Workflows can include approval, template and exception rules based on the business process.
Start with a frequent, measurable workflow such as lead response, onboarding follow-up, review scheduling or service ageing.
Yes. Many MFD workflows run on scheduled imports of standardized files from RTA reports or back-office exports. The import step should be documented, assigned to an owner and checked for errors before it triggers tasks or messages.
It changes their work rather than replacing it. Staff spend less time chasing reminders and compiling lists, and more time resolving exceptions, speaking to clients and keeping records accurate.
Test every workflow on internal test records first, use approved templates only, add an approval step for sensitive events and log every message sent. Start with a small pilot group before enabling a trigger for the full client base.
Start with a practical review of your current data, workflows, team roles and growth priorities.